The Price of Striped Bass

July 26, 2011
The price of striped bass

After years of holding up striped bass as the model of how humans can save a species from extinction, fisheries managers are finding out that the glue holding the model together is beginning to weaken.

Disease and pollution are taking their toll. Poachers steal at will. Government is unwilling to pay for scientific and enforcement muscle. Regulators posture instead of acting boldly.

It is human nature to continue to bask in a singular success long after everyone else has moved on. Ballplayers, actors and politicians extend their careers by reliving “the big one” and finding folks willing to pay for the honor of listening.

Right now, state fisheries managers are proposing a sweeping set of reforms to get a handle on a commercial striped bass fishing industry that the public doesn’t trust. Weeks of headlines and photos of illegal nets filled with tons of fish will do that to your image.

But both the watermen and the recreational community are asking the same question: Who will pay the bill?

The answer — coming in the next week or so — could doom the entire effort. Meanwhile, the state keeps plugging away at a plan to get the Maryland striped bass fishery in the Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic coast certified by an independent auditor as sustainable.

The difference between what the watermen pay in permits and fees ($451,000) and what it costs to monitor and enforce the industry ($1.2 million) is out of whack. The watermen say they can’t afford to pay for the measures that would go a long way to restoring public trust.

The recreational anglers say they won’t. And more importantly, they are not buying the old line that what’s good for the commercial industry is ultimately good for them.

As all this plays out, the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission will be meeting Aug. 1 to yak some more about striped bass, vamping until a new population assessment comes out this fall that will tell all of us whether we’re being good stewards or just running our mouths. It will be interesting to listen to the commissioners from all Eastern Seaboard states try to position themselves for both good news or bad news. No doubt the “I told you so” choir will be warming up backstage.

Speaking of choirs, the auditor from Moody Marine Ltd. will be in town Aug. 9, setting up shop in Calvary United Methodist Church next to the Department of Natural Resources headquarters in Annapolis to hear from the masses. You may testify beginning at 6 p.m.

Moody will decide whether Maryland’s striped bass fishery is up to sustainability standards set by the Marine Stewardship Council. If we make the grade, those in the commercial fishing industry will be able to buy the rights to use the MSC seal on their products.

But here’s what worries me. Even if Moody gives Maryland a thumbs up, who’s going to believe it?

We’ve had three consecutive years of below average striped bass production. The state still cautions people, especially women of child-bearing years and children, not to eat too much striped bass because of lingering cancer-causing PCBs. The Chesapeake Bay dead zone will consume a larger area this year. And a decade after conservationists issued their warning, the ASMFC is still trying to decide what to do about the commercial harvest of menhaden, a small fish that feeds stripers but appears to be on the decline in the bay.

Maybe the MSC seal can be strategically positioned over rockfish sores to make them more attractive to the marketplace.
Posted by Candus Thomson at 6:51 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Proposed Changes to Gill Net Fishery

Several CCA members attended the Striped Bass Workgroup public meeting last night (7/13/11) at the Tawes building in Annapolis. The reason for the meeting was to discuss changes in the gill net fishery based on the rampant illegal activity that has been occurring for years. CCA was proud to be there because we played such a crucial role in the discovery and publicity of these crimes. You can click the link below to read DNR’s proposed changes. As always, we are going to attend the meetings, do out homework, and ensure our rights as recreational fishermen in Maryland.
Tom O’Connell stated that decisions must be made by mid August. While there won’t be a public hearing, there will be a period in which comments can be submitted. All options presented are a menu. Not all will be required to meet the departments goals. DNR will review all comments prior to making any decisions.

Striped Bass Workgroup

Fishing Reports July 2011

July 8th

It rained hard for about 45 minutes and afterwards it was pleasent and overcast. We got many LGMouth and nice big snakehead. Great trip.

Capt Mike

July 9th

First fish was tough to get after 3 hours of nutin.. just nutin.
Then it was like the flood gates opened and muddy water from a feeder creek came roaring on down the main creek. Never seen that happen before. Very odd. Water temps also dropped 10 degrees. Time to move. It was two more hours till the next fish and then they turned on. A good 20 Lgmouth fell for horny toads.
I was getting worried but it all worked out..

Capt Mike

July 7th.

Had a hot trip.. but the light breeze and the constant action kept us cool as can be. Got two more snakeheads and they where filleted and released. Check out these nice LGMouth.

I realized after I cleaned the snakeheads that I forgot to take a picture of them.
Capt Mike Starrett

Josenhans FF ~ Summer Pattern Set
Josenhans Fly Fishing | July 7, 2011 at 2:17 pm | Tags: Chesapeake Bay, flounder, G.Loomis, rockfish, Tangier Sound, topwater | Categories: Fishing Reports | URL: http://wp.me/p1g6Fd-lE

Joel Davies with a mid-20′s striper
Whew! This should finally get me caught-up with the fishing reports. I know that I have been throwing a lot at you of late, but I hope the fishing (and writing) has kept your interest. Each season seems to bring a summer pattern slightly different from the last and this year is no exception. While last summer we had more bluefish to keep us entertained (we did have them earlier) that has been replaced this year with some excellent flounder fishing.

Michael found the flounder still willing
On Wednesday, June 29 Michael Bievenour and Joel Davies joined me for a full-day trip out of Crisfield. The routine was established – shallow water rockfish early and then off to the flounder grounds. I think we accomplished both feats, just maybe in reverse order. Mike and Joel spent the morning catching mostly small rockfish over some eel grass beds, as there was not much tidal movement to speak of. Since the striper fishing was slow to begin, we decided to try the flounder. Due to windy conditions and a couple of trips to the mid-bay area, it had been a week since we last tried for flounder and I wasn’t quite sure what to expect. Not long after stopping at my favorite spot we had the first flounder flopping at my feet. For the next couple of hours we had a steady pick of the tasty flatfish, the hook-ups coming just often enough to keep the guys senses on edge. As the wind dropped off and the tide changed we returned to a favorite rockfish hole. The fish were waiting for us. For the next hour or so, Mike and Joel battled stripers up to 25 inches casting plastic shads on 1/2 ounce jig-heads. Lots of fun on the feather-light G. Loomis spinning rods. It was a fitting end to a day with a somewhat slow start. I was always told it’s better to end the day on a high note and today I was fortunate. Good work guys!

David with a nice rock on topwater
Saturday, July 2 brought back Crisfield resident David Wilmoth, along with friends Ron Long and Jim Daniel. David had mentioned more than once (good-naturedly, of course) that I was putting a lot of pressure on myself, what with all of the flounder photographs on my blog. He was right, of course. I knew one day it would come to and end – but today wasn’t the day. I’ll get to that in a minute. We started off with some early topwater rockfish action and before long we had six nice stripers boated, including a ten-pound fish caught by Ron. While the action was short-lived, the explosive strikes in shallow water made the early departure-time worthwhile.
Now to the real reason David booked this trip – flounder! David told me he has been drooling (well, maybe my word) over my photographs of limits of big flounder, one of his favorite fish. He had me under the gun today and I was hoping the fish wouldn’t disappoint. We got to the flounder grounds a bit earlier than maybe I usually would and I am glad that we did. Being a Saturday, we had to share the spot with others; but aside from a boat or two anchoring in our drift-lane, all went well. And boy were the flounder up to the task. We had steady action, sometimes with double hook-ups, of nice flounder from 17 to 23 inches. In just a couple of hours the guys were able to box their limit of the tasty flatfish. A 3/4 ounce chartreuse bucktail with a 4″ Berkley Gulp! Swimming Mullet was the hands-down favorite this day. It seems the flounder have returned in force! We ended the day drifting the lower end of Pocomoke Sound feeding leftover Gulp! to small croaker, but no one really cared. The flounder had once again made the day and I hope I never wake up from this dream!

Ron’s first time jigging for flounder made him a believer

Daybreak on the Eastern Shore

Capt. Kevin Josenhans
Josenhans Fly Fishing
10154 Grapevine Road
Mardela Springs, MD 21837
443-783-3271
kjosenhans@aol.com
www.josenhansflyfishing.com

http://josenhansflyfishingblog.com

July 4th
We have been catching good numbers of stripers in and near the mouth of Eastern Bay. Most of the fish are from 20 to 24 inches with an occasional bigger fish. We are catching them on BKDs and jigging spoons. Flyfishing with sinking lines has also been productive. Try to find fish away from the trollers and you will have more luck.

Capt. Gary Neitzey
Fish Hawk Guide Service
410-937-8753
flyfishthechesapeake.com

07-04-11 FishingReport

Fishing Report July 7, 2011

The disappearing fish we should worry about

Topic:
Environment
Wednesday, Jul 6, 2011 10:30 ET
The disappearing fish we should worry about
How Virginia’s permissive legislation is destroying the menhaden — and the Atlantic’s ecosystem
By Alison Fairbrother, Randy Fertel, Gilt

This article originally appeared on Gilt Taste.

On a bright morning in May, a calm Chesapeake Bay glitters in the sun, an expanse of blue, the nation’s largest and once most productive estuary. A sudden commotion shatters the serenity: Dozens of gulls swoop toward the 135-foot ship Reedville, and the water beneath the boat begins to churn and froth. With two smaller boats at its side, the Reedville encloses a school of fish in a stiff black purse seine net. With practiced efficiency, workers onboard hoist a vacuum pump into the net and suck tens of thousands of small silvery fish out of the water. It looks like an unusual way to catch fish; it’s all the more unusual when you realize that this particular industrial catch is actually banned by every state on the East Coast. Every state, that is, save for one: Virginia.

GiltTaste The fish going up the tube are Atlantic menhaden, known to ocean ecologists as the “breadbasket of the ocean,” though some prefer to call them “the most important fish in the sea.” Because there’s money to be made, menhaden, all the fish that rely on them for food, and the entire ocean ecosystem are in trouble.

Found in estuarine and coastal waters from Nova Scotia to Florida, menhaden are oily, bony, and inedible to humans, which is why you’ve probably never heard of them. But their nutrient-packed bodies are a staple food for dozens of fish species you have heard of, as well as marine mammals and sea birds. Located near the bottom of the food chain, menhaden are the favored prey for many important predators, including striped bass and bluefish, tuna and dolphin, seatrout and mackerel.

Out on the bay, the vacuum pump on the Reedville removes 45,000 menhaden from the water. This is a small catch for a boat that routinely takes multiple schools, each of which can contain as many as a million members, stored in a giant hold below deck. There, they will wait for the ship to return to its namesake, Reedville, a remote town on Virginia’s northern neck peninsula, where they will be cooked, ground up, and sold. This is the “menhaden reduction” process, the basis for a lucrative industry controlled, on the East Coast, by exactly one company: Omega Protein, Inc.

The same oily property that makes menhaden so valuable to marine life can also be used for aquaculture and livestock feed, pet food, oil for paints and cosmetics, and as a component in dietary supplements. Omega Protein’s annual harvest is worth more than $168 million. Revenues for 2011 are projected at $218 million. Because of Omega Protein, Reedville is the third largest commercial fishing port in the United States.

Some scientists believe that menhaden could be a partial solution to pollution and the oxygen-depleted areas of water called, bluntly, “dead zones.” In these zones, pollution-related algae blooms use up the oxygen in the water, making it difficult for other species to live; it’s a particular problem in estuaries like the Chesapeake Bay and the Long Island Sound, where menhaden were once plentiful. Menhaden are filter feeders, swimming with their mouths open and straining phytoplankton (algae) and other particles with their gills. While the exact content of what menhaden filter varies by location and season, it is clear that menhaden have been removing damaging particles from our waters since time immemorial.

“Menhaden are the main herbivore in the ocean that eat phytoplankton, and without them, we have a problem,” says Bill Goldsborough, senior scientist at the Chesapeake Bay Foundation.

Goldsborough and other fisheries scientists are concerned about diminishing numbers of menhaden along the Atlantic Coast. Recent evidence shows that menhaden stocks are down 88 percent in the last 25 years, to a record low — from 160 billion fish to 20 billion. Atlantic menhaden harvesters have regularly overfished their target limit: 32 of the last 54 years, according to a 2010 stock assessment by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, the regulatory agency in charge of managing the sustainability of forage species like menhaden.

One sign that points to the scale of the problem is that species like striped bass that normally feed on menhaden are displaying symptoms of malnourishment and disease. Seatrout are near their lowest population point on record, in part because of a lack of menhaden. When faced with the loss of both seatrout and menhaden as food, striped bass have been turning to other cherished delicacies. “Striped bass will feed on blue crabs and lobsters when they can’t get enough menhaden. We are seeing increased mortality of juvenile lobster and blue crabs,” Goldsborough says.

Scientists say Omega Protein removes menhaden at a rate that makes it nearly impossible for the fish to provide the valuable ecosystem services that give them their vaunted title. The annual removal of adult fish is 65 percent or higher, making it unlikely that an adult menhaden will spawn more than once, if at all. Scientists say that this affects the health and sustainability of our natural resources: “[Overfishing] is certainly affecting menhaden, not just in Maryland but coastwide, and therefore it affects the predator populations as well that rely on menhaden. There is no doubt about that. We are competing with the predators,” says Dr. Alexei Sharov, head of the stock assessment program at Maryland’s Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Service.

The vast majority of menhaden are netted off the Virginia coast in the Chesapeake Bay and at Cape Henry, where the Bay meets the ocean. This is because all the states along the Atlantic coast have banned industrial menhaden fishing, with the exception of Virginia.(North Carolina banned fishing for menhaden reduction, but still allows a much smaller menhaden harvest for fishing bait.) Menhaden fishing boats like Reedville are out in the Virginia waters of the Bay almost every day from May to December, the state-sanctioned fishing season.

Why does Virginia allow it? Like many things, it all goes back to politics.

Omega Protein has been a generous and frequent financier of both Democratic and Republican legislators in Virginia. Decades ago, management of marine life in state waters was transferred from the Virginia General Assembly to the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, which has management authority over all species except one: menhaden.

Repeated legislative efforts to transfer control of menhaden to the capable hands of ï¬sheries experts have proven futile. Omega Protein has furnished Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell with over $55,745 in campaign contributions. The governor has signaled that he will veto any menhaden bill he encounters.

In 2011, six different bills were introduced in the Virginia legislature concerning the protection of menhaden, with six different sponsors, spanning the House and the Senate, and spearheaded by members of both sides of the aisle. All were defeated handily.

The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC), which has oversight of state waters, is poised to take regulatory action that would increase the percentage of menhaden that is off-limits to harvesters from nine to 15 percent. But even this feels like a stopgap measure. A recent panel of independent scientists recommended that as much as 75 percent of virgin biomass for species like menhaden be kept from the hands (and nets) of industrial fisheries. Virgin biomass is a term that describes the amount of fish in the water before humans ever started fishing there, so the amount of menhaden that these scientists are recommending be left alone is enormous.

And if the menhaden population continues to decline, it would have far-reaching ramifications. In addition to the devastating environmental impact, dozens of different industries also rely on menhaden, from the charter boat captains who take sport fishermen out on the open water all along the Atlantic coast, to the bait industry that supplies menhaden to the commercial and recreational fishermen who catch millions of pounds of fish each year that seafood lovers like to eat.

“Menhaden are a keystone species in the marine ecosystem of the Atlantic coast,” Goldsborough says. “Anybody that cares about the ocean along this coast should care about menhaden.”

Alison Fairbrother is the Director of the Public Trust Project, a nonprofit organization dedicated to amplifying the voices of scientists conducting industry-independent research and investigating corporate science. Randy Fertel is cofounder of the Ridenhour Prizes for Courageous Truth-Telling, co-sponsored by the Nation Institute and awarded every spring at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. His book, “The Gorilla Man and the Empress of Steak: A New Orleans Family Memoir,” is forthcoming from the University Press of Mississippi. More: Alison Fairbrother, Randy Fertel

Gary Neitzey Fishing Report

July 4th, 2011
We have been catching good numbers of stripers in and near the mouth of Eastern Bay. Most of the fish are from 20 to 24 inches with an occasional bigger fish. We are catching them on BKDs and jigging spoons. Flyfishing with sinking lines has also been productive. Try to find fish away from the trollers and you will have more luck.

Capt. Gary Neitzey
Fish Hawk Guide Service
410-937-8753
flyfishthechesapeake.com

Captain Mike Starrett Fishing Report

July 2nd

Fished entire trip with fly rods. Landed about 8 LGMouth and the short strikes still continue but not as many as in past trips. It was pleasure to fish with this father and son.

Capt Mike

June 30th

The trip today was great. Tide was wrong and the fish did bite. Not a lot of fish but some real good strikes and a snakehead that got away with one my best lures. But talk about a fight…the big snakehead nailed the topwater bait and did a run that smoked the reel. He dug deep in the grass and just kept going and going. I dug him out to the last few feet and with a quick pull snapped my 20lb braid..dang..It was nice to get some good topwater action again.

I will get my lure back…revenge will mine..

CCA Maryland continues to monitor Man O’ War Shoal

Below you will find a recent communication with MD DNR regarding dredging Man O’ War Shoal. Our position hasn’t changed. We are still extremely concerned with the plan to dredge the shoal.

Thank you for taking the time this past Tuesday to review with CCA Maryland and others the shell dredge permit application proposed for Man-O-War Shoal. I appreciate the Department’s efforts to gain stakeholder perspectives and understand concerns relative to this proposed project.
As you know, CCA Maryland has been very supportive of most aspects included in Maryland’s Oyster Restoration and Aquaculture Development Plan first announced on December 3, 2009. The one major exception has been the proposed dredging and use of fossil shell from Man-O-War Shoal. No matter how well intentioned, without a clear and achievable purpose for such activity, a funding plan and binding financial commitment to see that plan through, and a strong demonstration that the greater goal of restoring oyster populations Bay-wide would be served by such severe action, CCA Maryland has not and cannot support or condone any dredging of fossil shell from Man-O-War Shoal.
Specifically, the dredging of Man-O-War Shoal cannot be supported by CCA Maryland because:
- It has not been demonstrated why already available and previously deployed shell cannot be fully utilized to first demonstrate the effectiveness of rebuilding efforts proposed in the Oyster Restoration Plan.
- The proposed future use of any dredged fossil shell for a “put and take” fishery, whether it be 100% of any shell dredged or 10% of shell dredged, is an unacceptable use of public resources.
- Topping or seeding of larger expanses of low-relief oyster bottom has not provided any appreciable return. The potential use of fossil shell from Man-O-War Shoal in a wasteful exercise cannot be supported.
- There is a very significant funding gap that would prevent the full execution of the draft plan. This funding gap would most likely result in the misuse of any shell dredged from the shoal. Without a commitment in funding that would help guarantee the wise use of shell from Man-O-War Shoal, the State cannot afford to gamble with its remaining historic oyster bars.
In supporting DNR’s goals of restoring native oysters in the Chesapeake Bay, CCA Maryland would ask that the State:
- Focus its plans on utilizing the amount of shell currently available, that recoverable shell previously deployed elsewhere in the Bay and alternative materials, including the use of natural alternative materials recently identified in Florida. Any goals to restore specific areas of oyster bottom each year must be assessed to recognize available funding with the emphasis on quality, not quantity, where ecologically appropriate.
- Recognize that funding limitations are driving many of the decisions related to oyster restoration and carefully consider in any economic evaluation the benefits that may be provided through the use of alternative material instead of fossil shell. The longevity of these materials has a much longer lifetime compared to fossil shell’s demonstrated four to five year lifespan.